Monday, March 8, 2010

Foreign versions of our coming crisis

By Bill Fleckenstein

Greece and the United Kingdom are suffering a dire funding problem that is headed for US shores.

Regrettably, these days it seems that ferreting out the right investment decisions is sort of all macro, all the time. The top-down economic overview is far more important, I think, than the bottom-up fundamental view of any company or stock.

Important pieces to that macro jigsaw puzzle are Greece and the United Kingdom, as the U.S. is headed for a variation of the funding crisis, though how severe ours will be remains to be seen. Without a money-printing press -- because it uses the euro, not a currency of its own -- Greece is forced to consider austerity measures to deal with its debt woes. The U.K., on the other hand, is not as bad off as Greece, and it does have a press.

For America: A Greco-Anglo scenario?

A crisis of confidence has invaded Greek and U.K. shores, and we can all learn a bit about what our future might look like as we watch developments there. (The U.K. may be the most useful example for us, since we also have a printing press.)We will soon find out whether Bank of England Gov. Mervyn King will extend quantitative easing and, if he does, how the bond market will respond to a renewed effort to pump money directly into that economy. (The pound is already under a good deal of downward pressure.)
I would say that the U.K.'s funding crisis -- to use my ballgame analogy -- is probably in the third inning or so, even if we are still taking batting practice over here. (Read "Economy sinks as we save bankers" and "The next crisis has already begun" to brush up on that analogy.)

Greece braces for tough times

Go to Wall Street Journal

Back to Greece for a second: The sort of straitjacket that it's being placed in by its inability to print money is what's forcing the country to consider making tough decisions. Only in a funding crisis where you have no other options are the Western world's "soft" social democracies willing to -- or rather, are forced to -- make hard decisions. So, the upside of the crisis is potentially coming out the other side in a more sane, sustainable fashion. That's what we all have to hope for.

Inflation ahoy?

But before facing our own debt and currency crisis, the U.S. is liable to experience a period of stagflation and inflation. Regular readers know my view about the strong connectivity between money printing and inflation. (Read "Why all roads lead to inflation" for more on this.)What's difficult is trying to describe in advance the exact path whose destination is inflation. That's because government money printing infects certain markets or niches sooner, with some affected more than others. But one thing is knowable: Money printing always ends up raising prices.
Thus far here in America, we've witnessed a lot of taxes and user fees raised by the government, and businesses that have seen competitors fall away have increased prices. That's a variation of inflation, which will be exacerbated by more money printing.

But a really fine example -- and one that's liable to shock most people, as it actually did me -- is what's happening in China. For that, we can look to a recent New York Times story headlined "Defying global slump, China has labor shortage" (registration required):
"Just a year after laying off millions of factory workers, China is facing an increasingly acute labor shortage. (Meanwhile), as American workers struggle with near double-digit unemployment, unskilled factory workers here in China's industrial heartland are being offered signing bonuses. Factory wages have risen as much as 20% in recent months. . . .
Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook
"Some manufacturers, already weeks behind schedule because they can't find enough workers, are closing down production lines and considering raising prices. Such increases would most likely drive up the prices American consumers pay for all sorts of Chinese-made goods. . . . "The immediate cause of the shortage is that millions of migrant workers who traveled home for the long Lunar New Year earlier this month are not returning to the coast. Thanks to a half-trillion-dollar government stimulus program, jobs are being created in the interior."
So there you have it: Massive amounts of monetary and fiscal stimuli are leading, as they always do, to inflation.

Housekeeping

If all that "macro" stuff confuses you, then listen to a new interview I just did with Eric King of King World News dealing with how Greece, the U.K., the funding crisis, bailouts, money printing, gold and gold stocks are all connected.



Sunday, March 7, 2010

Buffett's tips for new investors


By The Wall Street Journal

The world's most famous investor lays out his basic principles in this year's annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders.
 
Every few years, critics say Warren Buffett has lost his touch. He's too old and too old-fashioned, they claim. He doesn't get it anymore. This time he's wrong.

* Quiz: How much risk can you tolerate?

It happened during the dot-com bubble, when Buffett was mocked for refusing to join the party. And it happened again last year. As the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) tumbled below 7,000, Buffett came under fire for having jumped into the crisis too early and too boldly, making big bets on Goldman Sachs (GS, news, msgs) and General Electric (GE, news, msgs) during the fall of 2008, and urging the public to plunge into shares.

Now it's time for those critics to sit down for their traditional three-course meal: humble pie, their own words and crow.

On Saturday, Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A, news, msgs) reported that net earnings rocketed 61% last year to $5,193 per share, while book value jumped 20% to a record high. Berkshire's Class A shares, which slumped to nearly $70,000 last year, have rebounded to $120,000.

Those bets on GE and Goldman? They've made billions so far. And anyone who took Buffett's advice and invested in the stock market in October 2008, even through a simple index fund, is up about 25%.

This is nothing new, of course. Anyone who held a $10,000 stake in Berkshire Hathaway at the start of 1965 has about $80 million today.

How does he do it? Buffett explained his beliefs to new investors in his letter to stockholders Saturday:
Inside the Berkshire Empire
Go to CNBC
Stay liquid. "We will never become dependent on the kindness of strangers," he wrote. "We will always arrange our affairs so that any requirements for cash we may conceivably have will be dwarfed by our own liquidity. Moreover, that liquidity will be constantly refreshed by a gusher of earnings from our many and diverse businesses."

Buy when everyone else is selling. "We've put a lot of money to work during the chaos of the last two years. It's been an ideal period for investors: A climate of fear is their best friend. . . . Big opportunities come infrequently. When it's raining gold, reach for a bucket, not a thimble."

Don't buy when everyone else is buying. "Those who invest only when commentators are upbeat end up paying a heavy price for meaningless reassurance," Buffett wrote. The obvious corollary is to be patient. You can only buy when everyone else is selling if you have held your fire when everyone was buying.

Value, value, value. "In the end, what counts in investing is what you pay for a business -- through the purchase of a small piece of it in the stock market -- and what that business earns in the succeeding decade or two."

Don't get suckered by big growth stories. Buffett reminded investors that he and Berkshire Vice Chairman Charlie Munger "avoid businesses whose futures we can't evaluate, no matter how exciting their products may be."
Diversify your portfolio

Diversify your portfolio
Most investors who bet on the auto industry in 1910, planes in 1930 or TV makers in 1950 ended up losing their shirts, even though the products really did change the world. "Dramatic growth" doesn't always lead to high profit margins and returns on capital. China, anyone?

Understand what you own. "Investors who buy and sell based upon media or analyst commentary are not for us," Buffett wrote.

"We want partners who join us at Berkshire because they wish to make a long-term investment in a business they themselves understand and because it's one that follows policies with which they concur."

Defense beats offense. "Though we have lagged the S&P in some years that were positive for the market, we have consistently done better than the S&P in the 11 years during which it delivered negative results. In other words, our defense has been better than our offense, and that's likely to continue."

Timely advice from Buffett for turbulent times.

This article was reported by Brett Arends for The Wall Street Journal.